The Sorcerer's Apprentice®
The Original Occult Suppliers since 1975
 |
 |
RE: Conciet.
|
posted by BABALONUIT888
|
Dear One and All,
Blimey Charlie, what a kerfuffle! I was in a foul mood that night, no doubt. However, I'd rather hoped for a sensible, merciless if need be, opposing viewpoint, apon which a valid structure of debate could be erected. Yet, they really are the transparent 'chaps' they seemed to be. Astonishingly puerile. I apologise for saying that, yet is the simplest abstraction to hand.
Men, even the intellectual, do enjoy a good 'tussle', though the attitude should surely be, to, metaphorically, after conclusion, help one's opponent up, wipe a bloodied nose, shake hands and form a bond! 'Tis in the nature of the beast. I surely didn't expect that, to my mind, very odd, retort. Can't flaw Denises thinking, as ever. Well, a brief visit, my new Rituals are coming along well, am interested in chaosphere c.d, if any left in New Year. Myself, I've found things as:-Mankind, approaching critical mass, is making its way to the abyss, en masse:-The old magic, good for backbone, simply dosn't work with root New Aeon energies. Chaos Magick, interestingly might.
Sorry for kerfuffle. Must work.
YITGW, serenity-One>All. 888
|
|
RE: Conciet.
|
posted by Outraged of Kensington!
|
He didn't do that do did he that do? Well he shouldn't!
I know HIS sort, a simple foot-soldier of a dual faceted Supernal Goddess, exposing the phallusies of decent chaps who use words like 'metaphysical' and 'abstruse', even when theyre NOT trying to get a job! Probably the same chap at my local last night, talking loudly about 26 yr. old bronzed Mexican ladies, and golden showers, causing me a most unfortunate trouser incident! Occultism? I've got four books! And I've read them! Yes, He jolly well should be cut down in flames, He'd probably be speechless! Then He'd know that true speech is silence-- Furthermore, His remains should be hurled into the void. But 'His sort' He'd be back, re-inventing himself, muttering about 'The silence within silence, of which, the reflected echoe is manifestation' or some sort of tosh. I shall be writing letters to someone! Anyone heard of Mexican ladies and
chilled champagne? Yours, Indignant, yet not knowing why, E. Goatist.
[Infoburst: Look, OutrangedOfKensington, StephenW said if you wanted a cogent reply from him you had to ask NICELY. Then again, I have yet to be convinced that Niceness is not the refuge of scoundrels. Come ON StephenW are you up to the challenge? BB Denise W ]
|
|
RE: Conciet.
|
posted by StephenW
|
You don't know anything about me so you are not entitled to make such relativistic judgements. The resource I provided a link to already embodies it's own explanation, and it is up to any potential readers to discover the connecting links and ramifications for themselves; I was merely pointing them in the right direction. As far as my own "explanation" goes... I would have been only too happy to answer questions from individual members if I had been politely asked, even as far as to give my own complete 'take' on this. But, however, I do not take very kindly to anyone making such aggressive insults against me and moreover, given your attitude, I fear I would be providing you with even more bones of contention to pick on me with, so I must therefore desist from doing so.
I am only being on the defensive, but I deplore the fact that the moderators are even allowing such personal attacks to go uncensored and so I will from now on be posting only in forums where the contributors will be treated with courtesy and respect. Therefore, any more alerts, or invitations for me to post here that arrive in my email will be marked as spam and will be deleted without even being read.
[Infoburst: Good heavens StephenW, I am still trying to fathom your outburst here. You are willing to cut your nose off to spite your face by punishing the S.A. for something Babalonuit888 has said. You seem a very sensitive sort of initiate to me - most of the adepts I know would have cut Babalonuit888 down in flames and vive le sport but here we find you buckling at the first challenge. If you want to spend your time prattling on forums which observe artificial pleasantries to preserve the egos of those who populate them that is your choice but you surely don't expect me to censor any contributors because they may have hurt your feelings? Personally I think you've just had your first lesson in real esotericism. What say you? BB Denise W.
|
|
Conciet.
|
posted by Babalonuit888
|
Do you consider yourselves some form of eletiste? Good for you.
Most of us contribute to aid other forum members.
Most of us work for a living, have numerous duties, yet make
time to explain our research/findings to others.
This is aid. Are you able to explain this abstruse metaphisical finding to us? No?
Enjoy your arrogant smug impotence, or prove your worth by explaining your findings to us mere mortals, in terms we can digest.
Thankyou.
|
|
RE: ancient geometry discovery
|
posted by StephenW
|
http://www.hermetics.org/pdf/deemonad.pdf
In this document, see chapter titled "Our Canon of Transposition
(Metathesis)" to gain some deeper metaphysical insight on this abstruse subject.
|
|
RE: ancient geometry discovery
|
posted by StephenW
|
|
http://espace.library.uq.edu.au/eserv/UQ:13443/n04_139_Proudfoot.pdf
|
|
ancient geometry discovery
|
posted by egohunter
|
|
Hi all; I would like to share this discovery with you all. I look forward to any feedback.:)x http://www.world-mysteries.com/sar_sage1.htm ......... http://thecompletefloweroflife.blogspot.com/
|
|
